Understanding about Cobots Against Industrial Robots
Published on : Friday 24-07-2020
Purchasing a new robot is a substantial investment for any business owner. Collaborative robots or cobots have been widely promoted as a more affordable alternative to industrial robots, but what is the catch?
Upfront prices
The term cobot has been coined to represent an unprotected, simple to integrate the collection of robots that execute tasks that were unsafe or repetitive while manual tasks that were higher-value are performed by the workforce up or downstream. Concerning upfront expenses, cobots are cheaper than industrial robots. Businesses have been provided by these low costs to robots, that is something to be distinguished with access. However, that doesn't mean all businesses will need to elect for a cobot to board that the automation train.
The alternate is robots. Believe 6-axis, SCARA, or cartesian versions. These are robots using payloads that may tackle software that is hefty, repetitive, and dangerous. These robots are commonly used for components assembly, pick and place and palletizing in different industries - and they've been for a long time.
Generally, robots cost more upfront but can provide entirely different levels of performance. Additionally, there's more to consider than the initial financial transaction. Firstly, meaning robots are now getting a viable option for smaller businesses.
Utilizing this model, the business can ensure those that are new to automation and businesses, are not priced out of their robot marketplace.
Cost of ownership
Whether we are discussing industrial robots or cobots, a struggle for small to medium-sized manufacturers when investing in automation in determining the true cost of possession. These are the expenses of additional gear requirements, energy consumption, and maintenance that enable this robot's use.
Energy consumption's price needs to be evaluated against the production output. As many cobots are new creations, many boast low energy consumption. If it only outputs one unit during that 22, but you would not observe a cobot. In the same way, an industrial robot can be forgiven by you for utilizing 3000 watts of electricity at the same time frame, in case it sparks a high number of units.
Programming
Based on TM Robotics' International Robotics Report, 79% of robot distributors stated that programming was one of the things clients were looking for when buying a robot.
Character, cobots designed alongside human employees. In reality, one of the most promoted features of these machines is the ease of programming. Easy robot programming is not an appealing feature for new users but provides users that are established with programming time. Demand for readily programmable robots is particularly evident from the rapid growth in sales of models that are collaborative.
Cobots are famous for their ease of use, a few having teaching ability, in which the operator simply instructs a cobot a new program, by moving the robot. On the other hand, robots have developed an unfair reputation of being labor-intensive, in relation to programming. That's not to say some are not, but when you test Toshiba Machines' robots and software's usability, it is clear to understand this is the case.
There's a debate for cobots and industrial robots, but the decision on which to select depends on the application. While industrial robots are changing some misconceptions about costs and programmability, the collaborative robot is also being held to high standards in relation to returning on productivity and investment.
There's space in the marketplace for industrial robots and cobots. The question is, which one is worth your investment?
To get know about the cobots and industrial robots, kindly mail your specific doubts and requirements at [email protected]